ComparisonGulf · GCC · MENA
Sahl/form vs. Microsoft Forms
Microsoft Forms ships with every MS 365 seat across the GCC's enterprises, banks, and government agencies. It's there, it's free, and it stops being enough the moment a form needs brand, logic, or modern analytics.
Microsoft Forms is the default form tool inside MS 365 deployments — and GCC enterprises deploy a lot of MS 365. It handles quick internal polls well. For customer-facing bilingual forms with brand, logic, and depth, teams outgrow it quickly.
Where Sahl/form has the edge
- Real brand themes — colour, font, logo, corner radius, layout variant. Forms doesn't touch typography.
- Conversational layout one question at a time; Forms is page-at-a-time, always.
- Deep logic: skip, jump, calculate, redirect, custom ending. Forms has branching, nothing more.
- Analytics that match standalone tools — drop-off, device split, time-on-form, CSV export with metadata.
- Customer-facing identity: Sahl/form publishes to your domain and your brand; Microsoft Forms publishes to forms.office.com.
Where Microsoft Forms is strong
- Free with every MS 365 seat — no procurement friction for existing tenants
- Teams integration, Power Automate triggers
- Respectable Arabic rendering on desktop
Feature by feature
Row by row, honestly.
| Feature | Sahl/form | Microsoft Forms |
|---|---|---|
Custom domain + branded public URL | Yes | No |
Brand themes (font, logo, corner radius) | Yes | Partial |
Data residency — Dammam (KSA) from Q3 2026 MS 365 offers Multi-Geo residency (AE, SA) on E3+ only, and commercial opex is significant. | Yes | Partial |
PDPL-aligned architecture, outside MS 365 MS Forms' PDPL posture is inherited from the tenant's MS 365 subscription; it doesn't stand on its own. | Yes | Partial |
Public-facing (non-employee) respondents MS Forms anonymous links work but live on forms.office.com — not your brand. | Yes | Partial |
Signable DPA without MS 365 commitment | Yes | No |
Conversational layout | Yes | No |
Skip / jump / calculate / redirect logic | Yes | Partial |
AI form generation Copilot in Forms drafts questions but not full flows with logic. | Yes | Partial |
Analytics — per-question drop-off | Yes | No |
Webhooks + REST API MS Forms exposes Power Automate triggers, not a public webhook. | Yes | Partial |
Multi-tenant DB isolation Both have tenant isolation — different architectures. | Yes | Yes |
Question types (count) | 25 | ~10 |
Free tier outside MS 365 | Yes | No |
Every row is verifiable against each product's public surface. Corrections welcome at hello@sahlsuite.com.
Regional view
How this looks from Riyadh, Dubai, Doha.
Saudi Arabia · KSA
Saudi banks and Aramco-family companies run on MS 365. Forms is there by default, and it's fine for internal polls. For customer-facing intake or NPS with branding, Sahl/form picks up where Forms tops out — without adding another licence to procurement.
United Arab Emirates
UAE's large enterprises and government entities are MS 365-heavy. Sahl/form sits alongside Forms for customer-facing use cases where brand, analytics, and conversational layout matter.
Qatar
Qatari government agencies have standardised on MS 365 for internal work. Sahl/form is the external-facing complement — forms that live on your brand domain and respect your visual identity.
Gulf-wide · GCC · MENA
Microsoft Forms is "we have it." Sahl/form is "we chose it." For anything customer-facing, that distinction shows on every rendered screen.
Pricing
At a glance, today.
Microsoft Forms has no standalone price — it's bundled. For orgs not already on MS 365, Sahl/form is the modern standalone option without a productivity-suite commitment.
As of April 2026 · microsoft.com/en-ww/microsoft-365/business/compare-all-plans
Starting tier
Sahl/form
99 SAR / mo (~$26 USD)
Microsoft Forms
Included with MS 365 ($6+/user/mo)
Business tier
Sahl/form
199 SAR / mo (~$53 USD)
Microsoft Forms
Included with MS 365 ($22+/user/mo)
Ready when you are
Try Sahl/form for free.
No credit card. Native Arabic and English. SAR pricing when you're ready to scale.